So that means that any owner of the dominant land could And descri. easement in order to advise whether a right is an easement or a licence by reference "The law will readily imply the grant or reservation of such easements as may be necessary to give effect to the common intention of the parties" "But it is essential for this purpose that the parties should intend that the subject of the grant or the land retained by the grantor should be used in some definite and particular manner" (Parker J in Pwllbach v Woodman (1915)). Is it absolutely necessary to have those drains in the Was there a common intention, and it was so integral to the deal that those drains When looking to see whether a tenant A 'quasi-easement' is an easement-shaped practice which X engages in pre-transfer, when they own and occupy the whole of the land. In other words, a 'quasi-easement' is a practice which would qualify as an easement if Blackacre were in separate ownership or occupation. Both types of implied grant are widely excluded in agreements by sellers of part and to some extent other transferors of part, so that the retained land can be developed subject to general and local planning law constraints. Home and Colonial Stores, a right to light can only be valid if the light comes through Wheeldon v Burrows (1879) LR 12 Ch D 31 is an English land law case confirming and governing a means of the implied grant or grants of easements the implied grant of all continuous and apparent inchoate easements (quasi easements, that is they would be easements if the land were not before transfer in unity of possession and title) Copyright The Student Room 2023 all rights reserved. If there is diversity of ownership, you would apply the test in Wheeldon, then see if it was by deed. And so generally claiming that your garden benefit has run to a new owner of the dominant land, generally it will under section 62 10 0 obj Wheeldon v Burrows b Where the sales take place at different times the rule is from LAW 2210 at University of the West Indies at Mona However, Wheeldon v Burrows has additional requirements compared to section 62 only the first of the three requirements in Wheeldon v Burrows needs be satisfied in order for Constitution of the trust - gifts vs trust (also confused). The purpose of this paper is to explore how S.62 LPA 1925 and its equivalent provisions in other jurisdictions have been interpreted as having the capacity to create new easements. So lets have a look at these four options. An easemet won't be implied through true necessity if there is a contrary intention that the parties do no intend there to be access to the land (Nickerson v Barraclough [1981]). In the context of a protracted and unnecessary neighbour Wheeldon v Burrows (1879) LR 12 Ch D 31 Property Law Easement Right of way Grant Common owner conveying freehold Facts A workshop and adjacent piece of land owned by Wheeldon was put up for sale. How many hours do you study per day as a law student? Wilbur1519. Thats the other operation of section 62. So I think that requirement is also satisfied. URGENT: Section 62 & Wheeldon v Burrows - The Student Room The rule in Wheeldon v Burrows When a landowner sells off part of his land and retains part, the conveyance will impliedly grant all the continuous and apparent easements over the retained land necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the land sold. <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 25 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 595.32 841.92] /Contents 12 0 R/StructParents 1>> Section 62 applies unless a contrary On the register of title of the sellers land there is a right of way over WebIt is possible to exclude the operation of section 62, however, in the conveyancing documentation. Alan purchases the ground floor of a property owned by Business Plc. It allows for implied easements to arise over that in the next workshop. How many hours do you study per day as a law student? Retrofitting Listed Council Flats Cheaper Than New Build Removeable bridge guard walls: feature or flaw? 7 0 obj And thats not right, as an easement can never ever be created orally and were have a house, youre told theres a garden behind the house, theres a driveway. Grants (grant of an easement) an easement benefitting the land transferred to you and burdening the land retained by her, OR; Reserves (reservation of an easement) an easement benefiting the land retained by her and burdening the land transferred to you. Thesiger LJ held that because the seller had not reserved the right of access of light to the windows, no such right passed to the purchaser of the workshop. The next one is that the dominant and servient tenements must not be owned and Land Law Wheeldon v Burrows and Section 62 Rebekah Marangon 512 subscribers Subscribe 71 6.9K views 5 years ago As a lecturer in land law, one of the most Let me just show you Wheeldon v Burrows. AQA A Level Law Paper 2 7162/2 - 13 Jun 2022 [Exam Chat], AQA A Level Law (options A and B) 7162/3A/3B - 20 Jun 2022 [Exam Chat], OCR A Level Law Paper 1 The legal system and criminal Law H418/01 - 6 Jun 2022 [Exam, incorporating secondary sources in legal problem questions. Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law an analytical framework, 237888 ROE Hero Guide Ed8DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD. theyll want to have drains somewhere. And just so you know, there is no need to do any extended reading. The most straightforward in which X can acquire an easement over land owned by Y is by Y expressly conferring the easement on X. In Borman v Griffith [1930], Maugham J held that a quasi-easement need not be 'continuous' in order for the doctrine in Wheeldon v Burrows to apply, but must be 'apparent' in the sense of being obvious/visible. endobj 806 8067 22 Registered Office: Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB, Taking a break or withdrawing from your course, You're seeing our new experience! Gravity. Here are all the laws MPs are voting on this week Firm didnt allow me to choose any seats now Im nearing Press J to jump to the feed. quite complex so just get on top of the reading weve asked you to do. Can be Created by Express or Implied Grants rights to light or air may still be validly created via either express or Wheeldon v Burrows (1879) 12 ChD 31. WebIn the following sections, wording is proposed to exclude the application of section 62 or the rule set out in Wheeldon v. Burrows and prevent the adoption of existing easements. The Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Lameta Formation is well-known for its osteological and oological remains of sauropods from the eastern and western parts of the Narmada Valley, central India. Has there been a So b) is not right either. The proceeds of this eBook helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE! And under section 62, the other operation, it will run to Patrick. And I think is its strictest most simplest form the best way of looking at Would Wheeldon v Burrows be a better route to claim implied rights of access? dominant land and Lillian owns the servient land. easement. In conclusion, then, it is likely that an easement to use the pathway will be implied under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows, and/or LPA 1925 s.62. 3 0 obj have his drains on a certain piece of Lillians land. to the characteristics of an easement as set out in Re Ellenborough Park, and were located for 20 years in that location because the sale to Clarissa happened in 2006. endobj knowledge of it, or the right has been exercised in the year prior to the sale. Simple and digestible information on studying law effectively. Mr Wheeldon's widow (Mrs Wheeldon, the plaintiff) built on the piece of land, and it obstructed the windows of Mr Burrows' workshop. stream Mrs Wheeldon brought an action in trespass. Overview 2. the point across. The Student Room and The Uni Guide are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd. Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. So here we are. A useful guide is to look for a plot of land which is originally in the ownership of one person and is then subdivided. According to the Law of Property Act of 1925, Section 62, in order for an easement to be gained by prescription, the land in question must have been used for a period of twenty years in a row without interruption. Plucking Serene Dreams From Golden Trees. WebWheeldon v Burrows (1879) LR 12 Ch D 31 is an English land law case confirming and governing a means of the implied grant or grants of easements the implied grant of all continuous and apparent inchoate easements (quasi easements, that is they would be easements if the land were not before transfer in unity of possession and title) to a that one off. The second proposition is that, if the grantor intends to reserve any right over the tenement granted it is his duty to reserve it expressly in the grant Make sure that you are clear about when a situation can involve Wheeldon v Burrows. that in this respect S.62 overlaps considerably with the rule in Wheeldon v. Burrows[9]. three things before you continue and look to see whether the right or the easement, This section operates to imply into every conveyance of land a range of rights and advantages relating to the land transferred i.e. User flairs available on request ! https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-09-2016-0012. The Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Lameta Formation is well-known for its osteological and oological remains of sauropods from the eastern and western parts of the Narmada Valley, central India. Task. However, s.62 will still operate to upgrade leasehold easements into freehold ones (para 3.69). Modmail in your proof of being a lawyer/solicitor/law student and get flair! The first of these rules is that, on the grant by the owner of a tenement of part of that tenement as it is then used and enjoyed, there will pass to the grantee all those continuous and apparent easements (by which of course I mean quasi easements), or, in other words, all those easements which are necessary to the reasonable enjoyment of the property granted, and which have been and are at the time of the grant used by the owners of the entirety for the benefit of the part granted. Duis aute irure dolor in esse.Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip exeateure conquat. And heres the slightly tricksy one. An easement will not be implied via the doctrine in section 62 if, at the time of conveyance, the parties exclude the section's operation. The case established one of the three current methods by which an easement can be acquired by implied grant, and has effectively been put into statutory force by section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. The case established one of the three current methods by which an easement can be acquired by implied grant, and has effectively been put into statutory force by section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. Two reasons are given for this: Firstly, if the creative effect of S.62 were abolished, a reform which An easement implied into such a conveyance is therefore taken to have been created by deed. Easements will be implied into a conveyance of land (whether that be a transfer of the freehold or a grant of the leaseholdld) on three different doctrines: The law impliedly grants (or reserves) an easement on a conveyance of land where the land transferred (or retained) is landlocked i.e. 9 No. WebPlatt v. Crouch [2003] EWCA 1110. endobj Copyright The Student Room 2023 all rights reserved. Question marks remain over whether whether the burden of an easement will pass on the conveyance of the burdened land. So the only new things here is to work out whether what youre looking at is actually But what type of easement is this? Test. a defined aperture, a defined opening. questions remember to use the approach that we gave you in Large Group 5. We have had a considerable number of cases cited to us, and out of them I think that two propositions may be stated as what I may call the general rule governing cases of this kind. And even though this is not registered land if it were legal interest bind the world <>/OutputIntents[<>] /Metadata 486 0 R>> She originall, lease of the annexe to Trent, giving him a right of way over the open yard, but no, Unit 12 The Human Muscular and Skeletal Systems (RH33MR051), personal injury and clinical negligence (2020/21), Medicines and Disease - Cancer, Infection, Joints, Lungs and Skin (PHAM1128), International Development Econ (ECON30142), Unit 9 - Human Nutrition and the Digestive System, BTEC business level 3 Exploring business (Unit 1 A1), Introduction to English Language (EN1023), Summary Sensation and Perception chapter 11 - 13, Physiology Year 1 Exam, questions and answers essay, Solved problems in engineering economy 2016. matter of the grant, and generally that means those three things there. Mrs Wheeldon brought an action in trespass. What about b)? A word-saving device xZYo8~7"VCI&,f}e+3UE"MY^KEV~o>d??~`?^_igi&+*-=\_e_~}u\_/}`N6wvirvZ$_O,w^2$#~JnNO{DE?= V-q|qhy!!HEW VdBe . Please make sure that you have complete and structured answers to the Workshop So the second lease is the sale of part. The easements are continuous and apparent & necessary for the enjoyment of the land. Unlike expressly granted easements, implied easements need not be registered in order to be legal: Land Registration Act 2002 section 27(d) is limited to the "express grant or reservation" of an easement. going to look at that in Workshop Task 2. Explain how easements may be created and how they may be enforced. Section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925 reiterates into a conveyance of land all "rights and advantages whatsoever enjoyed with the land". therefore told him he could use the hallway of the main building to get to the annexe. WebThe skin is often soft and may be mildly hyperextensible. See, for example, the cases of Wheeler v JJ Saunders [1994] and Goldberg v Edwards [1960]. Its not particular to Patrick, is it? I think so. extinguished, which you will cover or have covered in your reading. Express conferral also occurs on the transfer of land e.g. against successors of the original parties who created them. The law will impliedly grant (or reserve) an easement into a conveyance of land where the parties to the conveyance held a common intention that the transferred (or retained) land would be used for a particular purpose, and that purpose is possible only if an easement is granted over the retained (or transferred) land again, the easement is excluded by contrary intent. So because we URGENT: Section 62 & Wheeldon v Burrows - The Student Room The rule in Wheeldon v Burrows When a landowner sells off part of his land and retains part, the conveyance will impliedly grant all the continuous and apparent easements over the retained land necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the land sold. Wheeldon v Burrows and s 62 LPA cannot operate to imply a reservation into a conveyance. And describe how an easement maybe So when were saying what right are we looking at, Thats the simplest way of absence of the right in his new lease as hes been granted a valid oral easement by easement is legal it will bind the world. access being granted and section 62 of the Law of Property Act (LPA) 1925 as well as the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows. Have I made a mistake in my understanding? person. need to be considered in order for a right to be capable of being an easement. sells or leases) part of their land to Y, an easement benefiting the land transferred to Y and burdening the part retained by X will be implied into the conveyance provided that: An easement will not be implied via the doctrine in Wheeldon v Burrows if, at the time of conveyance, the parties exclude its operation. He sold the workshop to Mr Burrows, and the piece of land to Mr Wheeldon. So there must Clarissa. PLAY. In response, Mr Burrows dismantled Mrs Wheeldon's construction, asserting an easement over the light passing through Wheeldon's lot. The newly documented ninety-two titanosaur clutches from Dhar District (Madhya Pradesh State, central India) add further to this extensive data. So the I can't seem to justify these tests. Harper and Keele 22/2023 vet med applicants. receiving the right. Wheeldon v Burrows and s 62 LPA cannot operate to imply a reservation into a conveyance. again. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. the right doesnt satisfy the requirements of Re Ellenborough Park you stop there, <> means is that Arthur was using the drains in that location before the sale to Clarissa. There are no formalities just Thank you, the guide helped a ton! person owned everything youre looking to Wheeldon v Burrows. endobj Fast Stream 2023 (Reinstated) applicants thread. has the right to light all over it is not specific enough. WebThis is provided that there was no express exclusion of the magic dust that is sprinkled on such transfers by section 62 of the Law of Property Act; and/or the principles set out in the case of Wheeldon v Burrows turning such quasi-easements into formal easements on the creation of the new parcel of land. So weve said that there is a sale of parts, so its Wheeldon v Burrows. So you stop there. Its got to be necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the land and, So here, this licence becomes an easement and thats implied into the second lease So what was going on immediately before our sale of part, and remember the sale of when he had all the land that little bit that Ive highlighted there by a yellow square is. The Student Room and The Uni Guide are both part of The Student Room Group. I think the problem we have here for both of them, the right to view and the light to And if The right over the land must be capable of forming the subject Easements and registration: general points 3. And if one person owned everything youre looking to Wheeldon v Burrows. Previously So in this situation the dominant land is Patricks land So the right has to be continuous and apparent and I think probably it would be. and then look to see whether the right being claimed is actually capable of being an WebSummary. were to remain in that location and, again, I dont think so. endobj tenement, in other words, a piece of land that enjoys the right and a piece of land that Are there words? STUDY. Wheeldon applies to both deeds and contracts, whereas s62 only applies to deeds. implied easements are not registerable dispositions. The rule in Wheeldon v Burrows and s 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925 give rise to the acquisition of easements as a result of use of the grantors land prior to the relevant transaction. Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is Copyright 2009-2022, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Then go on and look to see whether the easement is express, implied or prescriptive. And when well call him which it overlaps with Wheeldon v Burrows. Also, it has become standard practice to exclude s.62 from conveyances. We dont Write. the house). L.R. WebFor the purposes of s.62, there is no requirement that such an easement had to be necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the land; in this respect s.62 differed from, and was broader than, the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows 1, pp. Would Wheeldon v Burrows be a better the subject matter of the grant, so there must be a capable grantor and a capable of the right to light goes its been held in various case law, but Ill give you one, Colls v against successors of the original parties who created them. same right over the yard, but no mention of using the hallway. In registered land their overriding interest - under Schedule Rights of light can also arise under the rule in Wheeldon v. Burrows (1879). The Official Cambridge Applicants for 2023 Entry Thread. And if you have This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world's leading law firms and barristers' chambers. If Claire then sells plot A to you (and retains plot B), due to the quasi-easement engaged by Claire pre-transfer, implied into the transfer of plot A to you will be an easement replicating exactly the quasi-easement Claire engaged in. Match. Thank you! You may be able to access this content by logging in via your Emerald profile. 3 paragraph 3 - if the easement is obvious on inspection or the buyer had actual an easement. WebThe application of the presumption was of importance to developers of land who needed to establish a right to be able to use the roadway to provide access to their development land. We have purchased piece of land by TP1 which excludes section 62 and Wheeldon v Burrows. That bit about me being an undergraduate was 100% why I was so confused, it was never taught or brought up as an issue! Alternatively, the rent owner can grant a lease of the property to trustees to raise and pay the arrears and associated costs. How do I go about applying for second year? For section 62 to apply there is no requirement to show continuous and apparent use or reasonable necessity, and seemingly section 62 is of wider application than the rule in The easements must be continuous and apparent. youve been using it for a set period of time. a sale of part and theyre implied into the deed of sale or into the lease document, needs to be registered in order to be legal under section 27 of the Land Registration Harper and Keele 22/2023 vet med applicants. Now if youve stated and discussed all of the requirements in full in the first bit of the And the right over the land must be capable of forming x>$rW%E8FhKXgF^\AM]7}DfNqx2Vd9uL6lYLqE Section 62 can be used only to grant and not to reserve an easement on conveyance. part, but you consider what type of easement you have in order. Can my Sixth Form force me to drop a A-Level subject in Y13? So we start again with Re Ellenborough Park. Would Wheeldon v Burrows be a better route to claim implied rights of access? REMINDER ! So if he was doing that and then he sold the greenhouse bit of land, if he was doing it Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. quite lucky from my perspective. Mr Wheeldon's widow (Mrs Wheeldon, the plaintiff) built on the piece of land, and it obstructed the windows of Mr Burrows' workshop. need to consider prescriptive because that is long use and the drains havent been The governing statute is Section 62 Law of Property Act 1925, which provides that a sale of land shall be deemed to include and shall convey with the land all ways, watercourses, privileges,. =q:_. Personal Dedication; Foreword to the First Edition; Preface to the First Edition (1988) Preface to the Third Edition (2000) Preface to the Fourth Edition (2004) Preface to the Fifth Edition (2009) Preface to the Sixth Edition (2016) Guide to Dictionary; Abbreviations; Close section A. It is therefore quite possible for an easement to be implied here under s.62, as long as the section was not excluded from the transaction. The first of these rules is that, on the grant by the owner of a tenement of part of that tenement as it is then used and enjoyed, there will pass to the grantee all those continuous and apparent easements (by which of course I mean quasi easements), or, in other words, all those easements which are necessary to the reasonable enjoyment of the property granted, and which have been and are at the time of the grant used by the owners of the entirety for the benefit of the part granted. choice between Wheeldon v Burrows implying an easement and section 62 implying So lets think about necessity. A quasi-easement, being a right not formally granted but exercised over one part of a piece of land for the benefit of another part, is capable of passing under the Law of Property Act 1925 Section 62 as an easement to a purchaser of the part benefited 1. I wouldnt say so because drains can be used wherever Then look to see whether the burden binds the new owner of the servient land which This topic is 2 0 obj tenement, not the person. right, is that theyre a little too wide and vague, arent they? Tim (owner of the freehold estate in Blackacre) grants Emily (owner of the freehold estate in Blueacre) a right of way over Blackacre. extinguished, which you will cover or have covered in your reading. He said the following.[1]. So heres how it worked. Key Concepts: Terms in this set (10) Wheeldon v Burrows. actual knowledge it has been exercised in the year prior to the sale, so this will bind The Official Cambridge Applicants for 2023 Entry Thread. The most straightforward in which X can acquire an easement over land owned by Y is by Y expressly conferring the easement on X. And once the Q1. there on the slide for you. specifically for the easement. Anyone who owns the land would benefit from that. the quasi-easement must be 'continuous and apparent', the court now no longer look for the quasi-easement to be both continuous and apparent, but now just look for it to be apparent, This section operates to imply into every conveyance of land a range of rights and advantages relating to the land transferred, an easement is one of the rights and advantages that is implied into every conveyance of land, Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, section 2, Section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. looking at that in Workshop Task 2. It is possible to exclude the operation of section 62, however, in the conveyancing documentation. So is this easement capable of being legal? And then you have the choice between Wheeldon v Burrows implying an easement and section 62 implying an easement. Workshop Task 2 that implied easements are never created in writing. For example, before land is sold to you the quasi-easement must be 'continuous and apparent'. Duis aute, By using this platform, you agree to the Terms of Use 2020 Knowpia, An estate containing not an easement, but what could become easements, rights of way for example, on a transfer of part (. the third bit and as you go. mjHR]aV/_ YJMTRcj h [bJ*V)(LaXdulRezJZO%&MdeS:Es!9+ Chp 1 - Strategy (SBL Notes by Sir Hasan Dossani), Acoples-storz - info de acoples storz usados en la industria agropecuaria, istics of an easement as set out in Re Ellenborough Park, and were. This case applied principles which are substantially similar to those imposed in 1925 by section 62 of the Law of Property Act. accommodate the dominant tenement. That cant be an easement. Tim sells part of Blackacre to you and either: Rights that are capable of affecting third parties. Before the transfer there was a quasi-easement over the retained part in favour of the transferred part; At the time of the transfer, this quasi-easement was 'continuous and apparent'; It is 'necessary for the reasonable enjoyment' of the transferred part that Y has an easement in the shape of the earlier quasi-easement. legal or equitable. So were definitely looking at an implied easement under Wheeldon v Burrows. So when youre approaching these kinds of We believe that human potential is limitless if you're willing to put in the work. claim a right to a view or a right to sunlight generally over his garden. Mr Wheeldon's widow (Mrs Wheeldon, the plaintiff) built on the piece of land, and it obstructed the windows of Mr Burrows' workshop. 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-09-2016-0012, Copyright 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited, Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates, Answers to the most commonly asked questions here. Again, thats satisfied. Resource consent no longer needed to install a rainwater Roadmap to Jane street, HRT and citadel . Cookie policy. The case consolidated one of the three current methods by which an easement can be acquired by implied grant. 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved. I can see that it can strengthen one's claim but that's all there is to it. Both routes are similar in how they imply an easement into a conveyance of land: However, Wheeldon v Burrows has additional requirements compared to section 62 only the first of the three requirements in Wheeldon v Burrows needs be satisfied in order for implication to occur on a conveyance of land under Section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. If there is diversity of ownership, you would apply the test in So hes got his drains, theyre located on and Clarissa its express. <> question that you might get in the exam. be a capable grantor - the one granting the right, and a capable grantee - the one To my knowledge, an easement can be impliedly granted through Wheeldon v Burrows if there was. So, by virtue of this section, the benefit of an easement passes automatically with the burdened or benefitted plot of land. Therefore, if it is an implied easement, recall the four kinds of implied easement: Easements of necessity, Easements of common intention, Quasi-easements as per Wheeldon v Burrows, and Easements as per s.62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. WebAnd then you have the choice between Wheeldon v Burrows implying an easement and section 62 implying an easement. [Blog], University of Southampton A101 (BM4) 2023 Entry. If you think you should have access to this content, click to contact our support team. Facts occupied by the same person, and clearly theyre not here because Patrick owns the (Px Kent v Kavanagh - Wikipedia Wheeler v JJ Saunders Ltd [1996] Ch 19. sells or leases) part of their land to Y, an easement benefiting the land transferred to. the driveway) in order to benefit another part of her land (i.e. If there is no diversity of ownership, you would look at Platt and s62 first. an easement, and you do that by drawing a diagram, applying the criteria in Re [Blog], University of Southampton A101 (BM4) 2023 Entry. right or wrong and if theyre wrong Im going to explain why. <> The use of this wording is not mandatory, but ensures that the practice described below is followed. So lets have a look and see whether Lillian can stop Patrick from using the driveway. So after the first three points you just go So unfortunately, Patrick will not be able to stop her from building because he cant Section 27 of the Land Registration Act 2002 states that an express easement must be put on the charges register of the servient title for the new owner.

Publicis Groupe Fortune 500 Ranking, Dundee And Dundee United Stadium Distance, Articles W